Desk 10:Function and you will Fundamental Deviations of your own Polyamorous Take to According to Current Relationship Variety of and you may Level of comfort which have Disclosure so you’re able to Psychological state Positives.
As can be seen during the Dining table eleven, pairwise contrasting found sitios de citas gorditas gratis that polyamorous somebody currently for the low-the amount of time nonmonogamous relationships said down complete matchmaking pleasure (since measured from the GMREL overall measure score) than just polyamorous anyone inside the monogamous dating (p=0.00), hierarchical low-monogamous relationships (p=0.00), nonhierarchical non-monogamous dating (p=0.00), swinging dating (p=0.00), triad relationship (p=0.00), polyfidelity dating (p=0.00), polyfamily dating (p=0.00), tribe/ pod relationships (p=0.00), “other” relationship (p=0.00), and you will polyamorous those who reported that they certainly were “undecided” about their most recent dating particular (p=0.00).
Difference in newest relationships sorts of and sexual satisfaction because counted of the the new GMSEX
47; F(eleven,6018)=, p=0.00). Follow-upwards univariate ANOVAs unearthed that discover a difference between most recent relationship particular into the the proportions of the new GMSEX: Dimensions step 1 (F(eleven,993)=, p=0.00), Dimension dos (F(eleven,993)=, p=0.00), Dimensions step 3 (F(11,993)=, p=0.00), Measurement 4 (F(11,993)=, p=0.00), Aspect 5 (F(11,993)=, p=0.00), and the overall size get, total relationships pleasure (F(11,993)=, p=0.00). To identify and this matchmaking types differed of which other dating designs, pairwise contrasting was used (Tukey HSD).
As well as rise above the crowd for the Desk 12, pairwise comparisons learned that polyamorous somebody currently from inside the low-enough time nonmonogamous relationships stated that the latest intimate dating was basically reduced satisfying (as the mentioned by the Measurement step 1 towards the GMSEX) than polyamorous someone in the monogamous (p=0.00), hierarchical low-monogamous (p=0.00), non-hierarchical non-monogamous (p=0.00), swinging (p=0.00), triad (p=0.00), polyfidelity (p=0.00), and you may polyfamily matchmaking (p=0.00). Pairwise contrasting learned that polyamorous some one already for the monogamous relationship said the current dating were shorter rewarding (given that counted by the Dimensions step 1 to the GMSEX) than polyamorous people when you look at the swinging (p=0.05) and polyfamily dating(p=0.04). Pairwise evaluations learned that polyamorous someone currently in the “other” identified dating claimed their intimate relationships had been faster fulfilling (just like the counted by the Dimension 1 into GMSEX) than just polyamorous somebody within the low-hierarchical low-monogamous (p=0.03), swinging (p=0.01), and polyfamily dating (p=0.01). In addition, pairwise reviews unearthed that polyamorous people who identified as “undecided” about their latest matchmaking form of reported that the intimate dating was indeed shorter rewarding (as counted of the Measurement step 1 on GMSEX) than simply polyamorous some body during the swinging matchmaking (p=0.05).
As can be seen inside Table thirteen, pairwise contrasting found that polyamorous individuals within the low-the amount of time non-monogamous relationship stated that its current sexual relationship was quicker fulfilling (as the counted by the Measurement 2 towards the GMSEX) than polyamorous anybody within the monogamous (p=0.00), hierarchical non-monogamous (p=0.00), non-hierarchical low-monogamous (p=0.00), moving (p=0.00), triad (p=0.00), polyfidelity (p=0.00), and you may polyfamily dating (p=0.00). Pairwise comparisons unearthed that polyamorous some body already into the monogamous matchmaking said the sexual relationship was indeed quicker fulfilling (once the counted because of the Dimensions dos towards GMSEX) than polyamorous someone inside non-hierarchical non-monogamous (p=0.04) and you can polyfamily matchmaking (p=0.03). At the same time, pairwise comparisons unearthed that polyamorous people that defined as “undecided” in their current matchmaking method of stated that its sexual relationships was basically faster fulfilling (while the mentioned of the Measurement 2 to the GMSEX) than simply polyamorous some one during the moving (p=0.05) and you will polyfamily relationships (p=0.02).
Multivariate testing was in fact presented and discovered that there was a life threatening difference in latest dating designs into an effective linear mixture of size from sexual pleasure and you may overall sexual joy as the mentioned by the GMSEX (Wilks’ Lambda=0
As can be seen within the Dining table 14, pairwise reviews found that polyamorous people in the low-the time low-monogamous dating reported that the current intimate relationships have been shorter fulfilling (while the counted by the Dimensions 3 on the GMSEX) than polyamorous some one within the monogamous (p=0.00), hierarchical low-monogamous (p=0.00), non-hierarchical low-monogamous (p=0.00), swinging (p=0.00), triad (p=0.00), polyfidelity (p=0.00), and you may polyfamily relationship (p=0.00). Pairwise comparisons unearthed that polyamorous somebody from inside the monogamous matchmaking stated that the newest intimate matchmaking was basically less fulfilling (because measured of the Dimension step three on GMSEX) than just polyamorous anyone inside polyfamily matchmaking (p=0.02). Concurrently, pairwise comparisons discovered that polyamorous people for the polyfamily matchmaking reported that their most recent intimate matchmaking was basically more satisfying (since mentioned by Dimension step three into GMSEX) than just polyamorous people when you look at the “other” dating (p=0.02) and you can polyamorous those who identified as “undecided” inside their most recent dating type (p=0.01).